March 3, 2019
I can't resist sharing with you these few items that, pretty much, reveal how I think and feel as well.
On the critically endangered list: The Principled
Republican
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) in
Washington on Feb. 14. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP)
Columnist
March 1 at 3:53 PM
Researchers in the Galapagos Islands last
month discovered, alive, a
giant tortoise of a species long feared to be extinct.
The return of the Fernandina Giant Tortoise, last seen in 1906, gives hope that another species, also thought
extinct, might yet reemerge.
I speak, of course, of the Principled Republican. The last sighting in
the wild of this noble breed was in 2016.
Hopes were kindled Thursday when Sen. Lamar
Alexander (R-Tenn.), voicing concern about the “dangerous precedent” of President Trump claiming emergency power to subvert Congress,
suggested Trump reconsider. Alexander could become the decisive fourth Senate
Republican to oppose Trump’s power grab, guaranteeing the Senate joins the
House in rejecting it.
Privately, most Republicans think Trump’s action
reckless, but Alexander can say so publicly because he is retiring. If
Republicans did not fear Trump, they would undoubtedly side with 31 retired GOP
colleagues who pleaded with them in an open letter this week not to sacrifice the Constitution “on the altar of
expediency.”
If heeding conscience, Republicans would have enough votes not just to
reject Trump’s transgression but to override Trump’s veto. More likely, they
will again retreat, more concerned about reelection than righteousness. Surely
they know Trump’s actions are wrong: They called President Barack Obama a
tyrant for his immigration executive action in 2014, and Obama’s policy, unlike
this one, had support — in a Republican-controlled Congress.
As veteran Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr.
(R-Wis.) said in opposing Trump’s emergency declaration this week:
“Previous presidents have used the authority” to implement policies “Congress
would have supported, but could not do so quickly enough. They did not invoke
the authority to subvert the will of Congress.”
Trump is figuring Republicans will buckle, as they
have each time before. He told the faithful Sean Hannity on Thursday that Republicans “put themselves at great jeopardy” by
opposing him, suggesting they would be casting a “vote against border
security.”
Seemingly nothing can shake Republicans’ craven political calculation
that appeasing Trump is a better course than voting their conscience.
This week
in the House, Trump’s former personal lawyer documented a web of deceit by Trump
in personal and public matters — and Republicans unflinchingly defended the
president. At the same time in Hanoi, Trump accepted Kim Jong Un’s wordthat he had nothing to do with American Otto Warmbier’s death — just as
Trump accepted similar denials of crimes by the Saudi crown prince and Russian
President Vladimir Putin. Then, on Thursday, a fresh economic report showed the economy falling short of Trump’s forecasts, even though
Trump’s economic stimulus — a tax cut and spending increases — will add some $2
trillion to the deficit.
Constitutional restraint, personal responsibility, human rights, fiscal
conservatism: As recently as 2015, these were Republican principles, now sadly
extinct.
Nearly two dozen Senate Republicans — enough to
override a veto — have expressed misgivings about Trump’s emergency declaration. They have called it “a bad precedent” (Charles E. Grassley, Iowa), “a
dangerous step” (John Cornyn, Texas) and “not the preferred way to go” (Rob
Portman, Ohio). Ron Johnson (Wis.) told NBC that “many of us are concerned,”
Marco Rubio (Fla.) warned that “no crisis justifies violating the
Constitution,” Ben Sasse (Neb.) fretted that “it will be almost impossible” to
reinstate constitutional balance, and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.)
said, “I hope he doesn’t go down that path.”
Yet only three — Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski
(Alaska) and Thom Tillis (N.C.) — have had the strength to announce opposition.
Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), now the paragon of
opportunism, was surprisingly candid about his motives. “If you don’t want to
get re-elected, you’re in the wrong business,” he told the New York Times Magazine’s Mark Leibovich, also describing his quest to be “relevant” in Trump’s world and to
claw his way to “influence” inside Trump’s “orbit.”
“There’s sort of a Don Quixote aspect to this,” Graham acknowledged.
How apt — except the president is a mad adventurer in service not to
chivalry but to personal enrichment, while Republicans play Rocinante and
Sancho Panza, his loyal nag and servant.
Surely they know what they are doing harms the country. But they pull
their heads into their shells, as good as extinct
===================================================================
You can’t solve North Korea’s nuclear challenge if
you ignore its torture chambers
President Trump and North Korean leader Kim JOng Un in Hanoi on
Thursday. (Evan Vucci/AP)
Deputy Editorial Page Editor
March 1 at 3:58 PM
“North Korea is not the paradise your grandfather
envisioned,”President Trump bluntly
informed Kim Jong Un. “It is a hell that no
person deserves.”
No, the president did not deliver that scolding in
Hanoi. Instead, he heaped praise on Kim, calling him “a great leader.” He went
so far as to absolve the dictator of responsibility for the unspeakable
treatment of Otto Warmbier, the American student who died shortly after his
release from a North Korean prison.
Yet, just 16 months ago, in a speech to the
South Korean parliament, Mr. Trump told an entirely different story.
“An estimated 100,000 North Koreans suffer in gulags, toiling in forced
labor and enduring torture, starvation, rape, and murder on a constant basis,”
he said. “The horror of life in North Korea is so complete that citizens pay
bribes to government officials to have themselves exported abroad as slaves.
They would rather be slaves than live in North Korea.”
Unlike much of what Trump says, every word of that
indictment is true. It is backed up by in-depth investigations by the United Nations, the International Bar Association and numerous human-rights groups. But in his zeal to embrace Kim and
bolster his delusional bid for a Nobel Peace Prize, Trump has forgotten it all.
In 2017, his administration waged an aggressive campaign to call
attention to North Korea’s record on human rights, including camps that have
been described as worse than Nazi Germany’s and such crimes against humanity as
extermination, enslavement and sexual violence. In addition to Trump’s speech,
the United States convened a meeting of the U.N. Security Council to discuss
the Kim regime’s offenses.
Now, the administration has veered to the other
extreme. For the first time since 2014, there was no U.S.-sponsored Security Council
meeting on North Korean human rights last
year. Vice President Pence canceled a
speech on the subject in December. Human rights did not figure
on this week’s
agenda in Hanoi, and neither Trump nor any other senior official said a word
about it — apart from the president’s shameful statement concerning
Warmbier.
By now, Trump’s shallow strategy for dealing with adversaries such as
Kim has become painfully obvious: First hit them with sanctions and insults,
then shower them with praise, excuse their abuses and hope that presidential
charm will prompt them to make concessions their regimes have rejected for
decades.
The diplomatic disaster in Hanoi ought to make clear once and for all
that the gambit won’t work — not even on the 35-year-old ruler of one of the
world’s most isolated states. The only apparent effect of Trump’s wooing of Kim
was to make the dictator believe he could sell the president on a decidedly
one-sided bargain that would have lifted most sanctions on North Korea while
allowing it to keep its nuclear arsenal.
The failure goes beyond Trump’s gross overestimation of his dealmaking
ability. The administration’s abrupt reversal on North Korean human rights
shows that it fundamentally misunderstands the challenge presented by the
world’s last Stalinist regime. The president’s theory is that Kim will trade
his nuclear arsenal for the prospect of transforming North Korea’s economy so
that it produces the prosperity seen in the South.
As U.S. intelligence professionals have tried to explain to Trump, Kim
prefers holding nukes to feeding his people. He knows that his regime would not
exist without them; nor could the totalitarian system survive economic
modernization.
Let’s imagine that Kim was tempted by Trump’s offer.
How would it be possible to open his country to foreign investors and normal
trade while maintaining four huge concentration camps where, according to a U.N. report, tens of thousands of people, including entire families, are held
incommunicado for life? What about the estimated 400,000 forced laborers, including children, working in construction and agriculture?
The simple truth is that the North Korean regime,
its nuclear arsenal and its system of repression are intricately linked. If Kim
were serious about denuclearization, there would be signs of an internal
easing. There aren’t. Consider the report last month by the Seoul-based North
Korean Strategy Center, which said it had confirmed accounts of 421 officials murdered or otherwise purgedby Kim since 2010. Methods included hanging, using antiaircraft guns or
flamethrowers for executions, and feeding naked victims to dogs.
The U.N. rapporteur on North Korea, Tomás Ojea
Quintana, reported late last year that “the human rights situation at the moment has not changed on
the ground in North Korea despite the important progress on security, peace and
prosperity.”
Trump’s diplomacy with North Korea has been
revealed as a fantasy. Real progress would require a restart based on patient
diplomacy, ramped-up pressure , and a recognition that the problem entails not just nuclear reactors and missile factories, but torture
chambers and concentration camps.
We have a similar situation here in South Africa with what has been named "State Capture". In case you haven't been following, the former president, Jacob Zuma, fell into the honey trap of a group of Indian businessmen named the Guptas. With a lot of hefty bribes and "gifts", they managed to persuade him to select people for top jobs in the various departments of government, who would then give them contracts and access to the government funds in different ways that led to billions and billions of government money going into their hands. One example is the electricity supply company, Eskom, which was actually making money and debt free when the government took over in 1994. However, now, as one example, it is R420 billion in debt, and has been given payouts for the government (taxpapayers money) for years now and it just kept getting worse. But the whole economy depends on this parastatal. All businesses, the mines, etc, can't function without electricity. But, the Zuma supporters stubbornly support him when it comes to blaming him for this tragedy and for the revelations of systemic corruption at almost all levels of government and we are not talking about peanuts. We are talking about trillions. How we are going to get out and how long it will take no one really knows. And Zuma says, so innocently, "what did I do wrong", when he got more payments from the Guptas that one can count.
And our Republican brothers and sisters... how can they, in their consciences, continue to support a person who praises the very people whose ideology we have been fighting against in the last wars, as though they are great leaders (Putin and Kim Jong un in particular) and befriends them and praises them when our intelligence people say they have been responsible and will continue to be responsible for undermining our democracy. He trusts and believes and praises people like Putin, Kin Jon Un, Duterte in the Phillippines, and many of those who are from the far right in many countries in Europe.
ISIS is dead, finished, crushed, he said, some weeks ago. Ha. I wonder what he thinks about the ongoing fighting in Syria. Does he really believe that they and those who think like them will simply disappear, never to return.
There are too many things that go around in my head, but to contextualize them, now that lent has arrived, my reflection is that Jesus and the Father and the Spirit must be very disappointed to see the beautiful world that they created and the potentially beautiful people who have been created in their image and likeness, destroying themselves and the very creation that was their greatest blessing, aside for Jesus Himself.
Time to so some introspection and shaping up.
Wednesday is Ash Wednesday. the ashes being a sign that we recognize how weak and frail we are but are still determined to get ourselves back on the right track and knuckle down to making this world or ours, in big and little ways, a little more reflective of what the creator had in mind and His Son. I will be having a unique lent in that I will be recuperating from my knee operation and will be spending most of my time learning how to walk with this new knee of mine. I am a little nervous about that but so many have already shared with me that they have had the same thing done more than 2 to 20 years ago and are happy and mobile. So I feel a bit more at ease about it, but, having just come out of the hospital with the spinal operation, it is too soon to go back to that hospital scene for me.
YOu all stay well and blessed and I pray for you and for myself, that lent will be a good time to take a good hard look at ourselves and see where we need improvement and maybe even reconstruction. Love and Peace, as always. Cas.